Exploring the mysteries of our past, civilizations, cataclysms, and what it all means for us today
New Younger Dryas Cosmic Impact Paper! Podcast #2
Podcast #2. I do an in-depth review of a new Younger Dryas Cosmic Impact paper that investigates the effects of the Younger Dryas in the Southern Hemisphere.
Ben,
Thank’s, I ’m here.
From my perspective as a machinist it’s no doubt what I saw is machined so we need rewrite the history.
That’s Big.
As Jousef said, all this was very hard. We leave the ’aliens’ for now..
We must start from there where we can ’can’ see.
-Me and Jousef agreed totally.
But, how can all this be passed out ?
That is really more of a mystory then the machining itself !
What is needed now is people in math, machining, geology, astronomy, and then ’maybe’ archeology.
I’m not against spriruality, but lets start whit the proof.
Well it’s there !
Thanks for the comment, glad you caught the podcast. It’s certainly a mystery. My perspective is really that – we should be embracing the true mysteries of the past and investigating them with an open mind, not dogmatically trying to box everything into a ‘primitive’ ancient civilization, but rather being open to the idea that what we’re looking at could be something outside of our perspective. We might even learn something!
In all these megalithic cultures the work just stopped like they knew a catatism was coming. I agree with the younger dras theory but this might sound crazy but I think our moon was towed in and set in orbit. There is alot of mysterious things that so called scientists can not explain when it comes to or moon. The ancients would have seen it coming and getting closer. It would have caused havoc if that was the case. Anyway just a thought
The strange thing here is that there is proof of machining, but we still struggle to realise that.
I’ll did just listen to a podcast whit Chris Dunn and even if he got the question direct he did not said upfront it is machining. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Dy6F2Nny1I
Archaeology is not into math or geology or into machined surface.
They trace a fishbone beside a artifice and then they decide the age.
That is silly, but the way it works, and they repeat what others told them to fit in the ‘system’.
If we could start check Serapeum surface, polishing technology and straightness of slabs at Giza, feed rate in holes, circle saw as the big black slab in Abu Sir ( amazing stone by the way ! ) we would get somewhere.
The slab in Abu Sir is a perfect example how we can see the radius of the tool used, thickness of cutter, federate per revolution.
That stone also showed all that are into machining if one think of maybe 4 meter radius and a 4 mm thickness. ( I had nothing whit me to check, but heard of 4 meter )
That is truly amazing tool !
As they come into stone blade wobble some so the surface is not straight but it really showed it is machined.
As Jousef said, this guys could do it, and why did they work in megalithic and very hard different stone if they could not do it by the way.
They did it, just because they could.
They was no giants, no aliens if you ask me.
But it was hard work and machining and they must been very cleverer as design structures as the pyramids is far from easy, plus today we has no clue about it all.
We are still at they is burial places…but evidence can show us to rewrite the history.
But when did it happens ?
Where is the tools ?
The scoops for rough is also very interesting as they was carved in butter.
This slabs is far from total perfect but that also proof it was hard.
Tools went off, drilled to far etc.
They was after a design here what they builded.
But to get archaeology to admit we has machining here will take another 100 years or so.
It’s a shame this stones is just there and no one really cares or even see them !
So how to get this forward ?
Ben, you do a good work here.
I must say it shore look strange if the added hydrated zinc & acid from the shaft down to queens chamber.
How did they get it up there etc. ( Ok, could be done but strange way to poor in energy feed 100 meter uphill ? )
Also, was this ‘only’ done at the big pyramid in Giza as few has a chamber under ( or 3 chambers )
If not, what was the other pyramids up to, and why is some moved out in degree to north ( as Forrester is into )
Add this up to Osiris shaft at Giza, Serapeum at Saqarra and the box under the step pyramid.
Purpose ?
I must say I’m more into frequency in some way.
They must been builded to maintain some use for it, otherwise it’s no real mean by the hard work quarry stone and all effort and machining to get it done.
What do we need most, maybe food, so growth. ( not electricity etc )
If priests/read the elite etc get people to grow, the more power and so on. ( did happens etc at Maya, and one day soil was gone off to rapid use and rain might stop and sociality was then over ( no aliens did pick-em up..
As I was told people moved south to the lakes and it was cannibalism and water got poised, vs illness, death, but people survive and they moved back to jungle, but no priest until Spanish arrived around 100 years later and culture was almost wiped away into stone age.
Priest in Maya know it was not possible to over growth but power is often stronger than common sense.
It’s all about frequency in one way or another, so my 2 cents down in Egypt is that.
But I can tell on machining, rest is pure speculation.
Questions….as I was into before, if now the dynastic classic era did work in limestone ( vs their tools and power to move weights more ’normal’ etc ) and did wrote on ( read ’older’ ) statues/slabs in granit, but if so – the original builders that did do granit/megalits – they must had look as on the statues – correct ?
But if so, did the dynastic era try to ’look’ as them ?
It must be either way here.
This is a good one in 2 parts whit Forrestee in Giza etc.
( I missed the machining on the black floor in Giza… but next time !
Next time I will be at Mena house ( Mariott – nice ) that is cloose and take more time around Giza.
Its a cool stone in a exploded pyramid only 5 km north if Giza ? A curved slab in tose granit.
Some like to join in fall ?
Jousef is cloose by the way to all this.
I contacted the man wanted ’info’ on this found on internet ( local news paper guy ) and he said it was found it in cental of town under a house, but now stone is barry under the new one…
I said, did no one took it out ?
No, a local guy that had working whit drill bits 60 years ago said it did look like that when core crashed.
-How can a 6 star core drill bit ( he showed one ) that do RPM and get a 7 star hole in stone ?
The idea core crached, hmmm.
-But did they drill there in central town 60 yesas ago- the news paper guy said no, it was a old house there. Ok.
It was a big fuzz he said and geolog explained it all, as it was hurted cores from new era drillings thst csuse it and end of story.
Ok I admit if one drill in wood and core crach, ok, but not in stone that deep in a star contour !
They shore has a good time now whit Khemet school and Brian Forrester & Susan Moore.
Forrester do a great work here, and each day at this trip is a joy even at home behind the computer one feel Egypt..
That trip is worth each cent if one is into this.
Ben, I hope you can later on bring up some issues I has been into here.
As how example Chris Dunn see the fuel down in the angle tunnels ?
What does Forrester think some pyramids is off north and not others, even the one he might call ‘super ancient’.
( It must be either way here.
And was it just the big pyramid that was some kind of power central, but what about the rest ?
And we do has machining down there, that is for shore !
Whit that in mind we must accept that we might are not probably talking about the dynastic classic era.
Another thing Jousef said, we just can’t be shore how old this is, as it’s just most speculation.
If a catastrophe was 12.500 years ago, how old was that civilisation before, 15, 20 thousands – more ?
Obvisly there are as in Peru very easy to see older work and newer work.
How this can go on, and the archaeology miss this when it’s so easy see the megalithic than the more ‘easy’ limestone works ?
Are they blind or politics ?
How can it go on that they trace a age by wooden fires, skeleton, writings/hieroglyphs, animal bones etc ?
It’s way wrong.
-Next thing is the statues that really get me confused !
One comment Forrester yesterday on You-Tube when they was in Luxor that how can he say original builders machined some statue in granite but this guys has the same ‘style’ as the dynastic.
This is a riddle we must work over how it is !
One way is the machinist ( read = the original builder ) and god knows how old that is, and they had this ‘style’.
-Then something wiped them off and the new era came and they saw the statues and copy them ( and as example Forrster mean they did hieroglyphs writings on them later on )
But how that explain hieroglyphs on crunched stones, statues ?
Well, I’m not totally onboard on that one ( as they guy that comment Forrester.
Something is very odd whit that one.
Let’s say the Egypt era had the same architect but a tragedy happens and the this civilisations continued, but later on they give up the megalithic ideas and go over to a much easier work in stone – but same culture etc in the big picture. ( Tools or experience was gone, or ?
So we has ‘machining’, and it did not exist – or did it by the ‘classic’ Egyptians ?
We must realise it’s machining down there – period. ( and that’s BIG.
Well, can we say according to drawings/text that the classic dynasties had not any tools ( needed for this work in granite anyway , and rest of older was wiped away ?
Hi Ben! Terrific vids! Have been binge watching them as I also read up on the subject with Graham Hancock, Robert Schoch, Brien Foerster, Richard Firestone etc. Really fascinating and you are doing a great job. Not too dry, very well narrated, great visuals. Kudos! I kicked in some $$ for the cause. Keep ip the good work!
I just viewed your Inca and younger dryas film.It makes no
Mention of electrical energy and it’s destructive power.
Immanuel Velikovsky,has written “Worlds in Collision “
over 70 years ago.This book was and still is revolutionary.
Velikovsky must be read to fully understand the role this
energy has played in civilization.He was a man of genius .I
have read all of his books.once you learn of him you might
consider doing a work about him and his life.
I’ve had a few discussions on Velikovsky with people, I’m aware of his work. I could probably use a refresher I suppose, I’ll add it to the list. Thanks for the comment!
I don’t support closed minded bigots! if you are willing to ignore or have not researched something as basic as the historicity of Jesus, what else are you ignoring or not researching? your bigoted intolerance turns viewers off, not cool
Historicity of Jesus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Most biblical scholars and classical historians see the theories of his non-existence as effectively refuted,[16][18][98] and in modern scholarship, the Christ myth theory is a fringe theory and finds virtually no support from scholars.[99][2][100][101][note 3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus
Look at you go over there with your faux, programmed outrage. I’m sure your angry little outburst was done in the spirit of the lord, yes? The fact happens to be that outside of the bible, there are scant reports of your favorite little gruesome and depressing wall hanging over there ever existing as a person. There did happen to be a bunch of historians running around that part of the middle east at the time. No reports of miracles, no reports of zombies being reanimated, or carpenters doing magic tricks with fish. There is one report of a ‘Christos’ which refers to a title, not a person. The bible is a bunch of nonsense, not a historical document. Small children see through this sillyness until repeatedly brainwashed out of it, thankfully it never happened to me – I wonder why it is that I don’t believe a word of your culty bullshit?
Get some education, learn how to do something called ‘critical thinking,’ and get some help for the childhood brainwashing. my sympathies, I hope it all works out for you!
In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened. -Genesis 7:11
Ben,
Thank’s, I ’m here.
From my perspective as a machinist it’s no doubt what I saw is machined so we need rewrite the history.
That’s Big.
As Jousef said, all this was very hard. We leave the ’aliens’ for now..
We must start from there where we can ’can’ see.
-Me and Jousef agreed totally.
But, how can all this be passed out ?
That is really more of a mystory then the machining itself !
What is needed now is people in math, machining, geology, astronomy, and then ’maybe’ archeology.
I’m not against spriruality, but lets start whit the proof.
Well it’s there !
Thanks for the comment, glad you caught the podcast. It’s certainly a mystery. My perspective is really that – we should be embracing the true mysteries of the past and investigating them with an open mind, not dogmatically trying to box everything into a ‘primitive’ ancient civilization, but rather being open to the idea that what we’re looking at could be something outside of our perspective. We might even learn something!
In all these megalithic cultures the work just stopped like they knew a catatism was coming. I agree with the younger dras theory but this might sound crazy but I think our moon was towed in and set in orbit. There is alot of mysterious things that so called scientists can not explain when it comes to or moon. The ancients would have seen it coming and getting closer. It would have caused havoc if that was the case. Anyway just a thought
The strange thing here is that there is proof of machining, but we still struggle to realise that.
I’ll did just listen to a podcast whit Chris Dunn and even if he got the question direct he did not said upfront it is machining.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Dy6F2Nny1I
Archaeology is not into math or geology or into machined surface.
They trace a fishbone beside a artifice and then they decide the age.
That is silly, but the way it works, and they repeat what others told them to fit in the ‘system’.
If we could start check Serapeum surface, polishing technology and straightness of slabs at Giza, feed rate in holes, circle saw as the big black slab in Abu Sir ( amazing stone by the way ! ) we would get somewhere.
The slab in Abu Sir is a perfect example how we can see the radius of the tool used, thickness of cutter, federate per revolution.
That stone also showed all that are into machining if one think of maybe 4 meter radius and a 4 mm thickness. ( I had nothing whit me to check, but heard of 4 meter )
That is truly amazing tool !
As they come into stone blade wobble some so the surface is not straight but it really showed it is machined.
As Jousef said, this guys could do it, and why did they work in megalithic and very hard different stone if they could not do it by the way.
They did it, just because they could.
They was no giants, no aliens if you ask me.
But it was hard work and machining and they must been very cleverer as design structures as the pyramids is far from easy, plus today we has no clue about it all.
We are still at they is burial places…but evidence can show us to rewrite the history.
But when did it happens ?
Where is the tools ?
The scoops for rough is also very interesting as they was carved in butter.
This slabs is far from total perfect but that also proof it was hard.
Tools went off, drilled to far etc.
They was after a design here what they builded.
But to get archaeology to admit we has machining here will take another 100 years or so.
It’s a shame this stones is just there and no one really cares or even see them !
So how to get this forward ?
Ben, you do a good work here.
Thanks Hank. I will try to interview Chris Dunn at some point, I would love to talk to him.
I would like to add up some here.
I recently saw from YouTube about the energy/hydrogen idée Dunn has been into ( I know read his book ; Giza power plants )
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=christofer+dunn+giza+powerplants+ide+you+tube&&view=detail&mid=62B25987689AA5FF669162B25987689AA5FF6691&&FORM=VRDGAR
I must say it shore look strange if the added hydrated zinc & acid from the shaft down to queens chamber.
How did they get it up there etc. ( Ok, could be done but strange way to poor in energy feed 100 meter uphill ? )
Also, was this ‘only’ done at the big pyramid in Giza as few has a chamber under ( or 3 chambers )
If not, what was the other pyramids up to, and why is some moved out in degree to north ( as Forrester is into )
Add this up to Osiris shaft at Giza, Serapeum at Saqarra and the box under the step pyramid.
Purpose ?
I must say I’m more into frequency in some way.
They must been builded to maintain some use for it, otherwise it’s no real mean by the hard work quarry stone and all effort and machining to get it done.
What do we need most, maybe food, so growth. ( not electricity etc )
If priests/read the elite etc get people to grow, the more power and so on. ( did happens etc at Maya, and one day soil was gone off to rapid use and rain might stop and sociality was then over ( no aliens did pick-em up..
As I was told people moved south to the lakes and it was cannibalism and water got poised, vs illness, death, but people survive and they moved back to jungle, but no priest until Spanish arrived around 100 years later and culture was almost wiped away into stone age.
Priest in Maya know it was not possible to over growth but power is often stronger than common sense.
It’s all about frequency in one way or another, so my 2 cents down in Egypt is that.
But I can tell on machining, rest is pure speculation.
Let’s see now what Ben come up whit !
Questions….as I was into before, if now the dynastic classic era did work in limestone ( vs their tools and power to move weights more ’normal’ etc ) and did wrote on ( read ’older’ ) statues/slabs in granit, but if so – the original builders that did do granit/megalits – they must had look as on the statues – correct ?
But if so, did the dynastic era try to ’look’ as them ?
It must be either way here.
This is a good one in 2 parts whit Forrestee in Giza etc.
( I missed the machining on the black floor in Giza… but next time !
Next time I will be at Mena house ( Mariott – nice ) that is cloose and take more time around Giza.
Its a cool stone in a exploded pyramid only 5 km north if Giza ? A curved slab in tose granit.
Some like to join in fall ?
Jousef is cloose by the way to all this.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=chrisdunn+raDIO+PYRAMIDS&&view=detail&mid=673CE2F2836A2F87543E673CE2F2836A2F87543E&&FORM=VRDGAR
I noted they has found ’star holes’ around the world and one actually in Volda/Norway.
Not ’that’ far from me, ok a weekend trip by car.
http://www.relicsoftheancients.com/images/holes/star_holes/skyoyecomgeologypage/steinhull1.jpg-for-web-LARGE.jpg
I contacted the man wanted ’info’ on this found on internet ( local news paper guy ) and he said it was found it in cental of town under a house, but now stone is barry under the new one…
I said, did no one took it out ?
No, a local guy that had working whit drill bits 60 years ago said it did look like that when core crashed.
-How can a 6 star core drill bit ( he showed one ) that do RPM and get a 7 star hole in stone ?
The idea core crached, hmmm.
-But did they drill there in central town 60 yesas ago- the news paper guy said no, it was a old house there. Ok.
It was a big fuzz he said and geolog explained it all, as it was hurted cores from new era drillings thst csuse it and end of story.
Ok I admit if one drill in wood and core crach, ok, but not in stone that deep in a star contour !
Anyway, its gone now.
They shore has a good time now whit Khemet school and Brian Forrester & Susan Moore.
Forrester do a great work here, and each day at this trip is a joy even at home behind the computer one feel Egypt..
That trip is worth each cent if one is into this.
Ben, I hope you can later on bring up some issues I has been into here.
As how example Chris Dunn see the fuel down in the angle tunnels ?
What does Forrester think some pyramids is off north and not others, even the one he might call ‘super ancient’.
( It must be either way here.
And was it just the big pyramid that was some kind of power central, but what about the rest ?
And we do has machining down there, that is for shore !
Whit that in mind we must accept that we might are not probably talking about the dynastic classic era.
Another thing Jousef said, we just can’t be shore how old this is, as it’s just most speculation.
If a catastrophe was 12.500 years ago, how old was that civilisation before, 15, 20 thousands – more ?
Obvisly there are as in Peru very easy to see older work and newer work.
How this can go on, and the archaeology miss this when it’s so easy see the megalithic than the more ‘easy’ limestone works ?
Are they blind or politics ?
How can it go on that they trace a age by wooden fires, skeleton, writings/hieroglyphs, animal bones etc ?
It’s way wrong.
-Next thing is the statues that really get me confused !
One comment Forrester yesterday on You-Tube when they was in Luxor that how can he say original builders machined some statue in granite but this guys has the same ‘style’ as the dynastic.
This is a riddle we must work over how it is !
One way is the machinist ( read = the original builder ) and god knows how old that is, and they had this ‘style’.
-Then something wiped them off and the new era came and they saw the statues and copy them ( and as example Forrster mean they did hieroglyphs writings on them later on )
But how that explain hieroglyphs on crunched stones, statues ?
Well, I’m not totally onboard on that one ( as they guy that comment Forrester.
Something is very odd whit that one.
Let’s say the Egypt era had the same architect but a tragedy happens and the this civilisations continued, but later on they give up the megalithic ideas and go over to a much easier work in stone – but same culture etc in the big picture. ( Tools or experience was gone, or ?
So we has ‘machining’, and it did not exist – or did it by the ‘classic’ Egyptians ?
We must realise it’s machining down there – period. ( and that’s BIG.
Well, can we say according to drawings/text that the classic dynasties had not any tools ( needed for this work in granite anyway , and rest of older was wiped away ?
Ideas on this riddle ?
Hi Ben! Terrific vids! Have been binge watching them as I also read up on the subject with Graham Hancock, Robert Schoch, Brien Foerster, Richard Firestone etc. Really fascinating and you are doing a great job. Not too dry, very well narrated, great visuals. Kudos! I kicked in some $$ for the cause. Keep ip the good work!
I just viewed your Inca and younger dryas film.It makes no
Mention of electrical energy and it’s destructive power.
Immanuel Velikovsky,has written “Worlds in Collision “
over 70 years ago.This book was and still is revolutionary.
Velikovsky must be read to fully understand the role this
energy has played in civilization.He was a man of genius .I
have read all of his books.once you learn of him you might
consider doing a work about him and his life.
and
I’ve had a few discussions on Velikovsky with people, I’m aware of his work. I could probably use a refresher I suppose, I’ll add it to the list. Thanks for the comment!
I don’t support closed minded bigots! if you are willing to ignore or have not researched something as basic as the historicity of Jesus, what else are you ignoring or not researching? your bigoted intolerance turns viewers off, not cool
Historicity of Jesus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Most biblical scholars and classical historians see the theories of his non-existence as effectively refuted,[16][18][98] and in modern scholarship, the Christ myth theory is a fringe theory and finds virtually no support from scholars.[99][2][100][101][note 3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus
hahaha using wikipedia as proof, lol.
Look at you go over there with your faux, programmed outrage. I’m sure your angry little outburst was done in the spirit of the lord, yes? The fact happens to be that outside of the bible, there are scant reports of your favorite little gruesome and depressing wall hanging over there ever existing as a person. There did happen to be a bunch of historians running around that part of the middle east at the time. No reports of miracles, no reports of zombies being reanimated, or carpenters doing magic tricks with fish. There is one report of a ‘Christos’ which refers to a title, not a person. The bible is a bunch of nonsense, not a historical document. Small children see through this sillyness until repeatedly brainwashed out of it, thankfully it never happened to me – I wonder why it is that I don’t believe a word of your culty bullshit?
Get some education, learn how to do something called ‘critical thinking,’ and get some help for the childhood brainwashing. my sympathies, I hope it all works out for you!
In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened. -Genesis 7:11