Whew.
that has been a long several days of editing! After all the conceptual work is done, the writing and recording is done, the editing can really chafe you, so I’m learning.
But I finally managed to wrap up my Serapeum series, with this, the final episode, taking a hard look at the evidence for renovation on the site, examining some of the contradictions in the othodox story.
In previous episodes, I’ve been promising conclusions and that I would tell you what I really think about the history of this site – and so I do, and it extends to much of ancient Egypt.
So much for shorter content! 🙂
Ben !
-Thanks’ for a great series and inspiration.
I’m already on my way ‘in mind so far’ for the next trip !
Your final really are as far a sum up can be here except – to get into wilder speculations.
But how can proof come up ?
I agree most ‘speculations’ of how & especially why so far don’t make to much sense.
As you are into, we see all this from ‘our’ side of life and technology.
But as Jousef said no one can say of the true timeline here and it’s also a speculation but its ‘maybe’ geologically ok that a incident happens around 12 thousand years ago that might wipe out a civilisation.
What we do can say is modern archaeology is wrong by say the did all this by copper chisels and their story in timeline and the dynasties.
As you say we might can move on here if we can research more and add in mathematics, astronomers, geology, machinists etc to look at it.
-But that’s not going to happens that easy !
Even if there might be money in research, this will really gain nothing to our ‘money’ world.
It will only mess up and turn around what’s been told and the political game here will not allowe that.
So the people that get pay by system will never give this up easy and ‘admit’ we has a error here.
So what can be told ?
Yes, we has machine marks.
How many really cares, I say very few.
What will we do to that proof here and now ?
-Well, certainly by the work example you do, is to make more people to see this.
As I machinist I can tell on machining marks as I know how tool marks look.
The rest of all this, well, I’m as lost as the rest of us.
What I do can say is nature is rather easy.
Cosmos show the same building stones and if life its need energy in some form.
Did they build this just as a ‘show off’ for them or as a example later on people, as us ?
-No, I don’t think that make sense.
It must be a purpose here and that purpose might has a more easy answer that we might think, vs the complexity of it.
It must be something ‘that’ needed, and they had the same nature law as we.
They needed energy, they needed food.
Maybe for us now it is a no reach to ever get this solved out.
Maybe it is at the moment explain our life on the 1800’s to someone how we live now ( would be real hard )
We might need say 10 or 100 generation more until we see what they was doing and then it make sense ?
Ben,
Not so many comments here, but there are on the YouTube channel.
Several has been into my thoughts as well why the original builders if we call than that do look as the later dynasties.
That should be something for you to dig into next !
Ok, one can think it was the dynasties as we know them ( if the time frame is what’s told ) that had the power to do this construction we see proof of machining, but no text, no nothing show us they had it.
And for me it’s clear their techniques is at a lower level than the granite slabs and works, same as in ex Peru.
As I see it, they rebuilded it, and they made very nice constructions but not the megalithic.
One comment on YouTube said he can easy see how they did all this by easy and simple way.
Well, if he can so easy see it, then he will get the Nobel price.
Some said your conclusion was not much to add, well maybe not but you showed it and it is a great series.
Another was into all this is to ‘convincing themselves’ to believe in crazy irrational ideas about the ancient past.
He did go that far to say it might mean a Dunning Kruger effect.
Well I went there and been on Giza twice and I’m a CNC machinist.
Besides all things into this are as quarry, move the stones and the machining and polishing etc etc all effort in math we do has the proof of machining.
That must mean something.
I don’t mean energy will be put on people that can’t see this, and from that your series is great as many will see it’s a case going on here that not fit into general archaeology.
As I see it, machining proof is there and we will fast get into speculation of why and when and by who, but we can see the look on statues and that might be a next level get this into.
Just a idea.
Thanks Hank. And thankyou for your recent contribution over paypal – that really means a lot.
I don’t sweat the comments section on youtube at all. I don’t expect everyone to agree with me, and no matter what I say or so there will always be people that will never ever change their mind, and other’s that are only there to heckle and say negative stuff. Shrug. It’s the nature of putting something out there in public. If they feel that strongly about it, they should make their own video! I also laugh at the people that suggest we know exactly how it was all done, those are the same people that just dismiss any evidence to the contrary out of hand, or they tow the establishment line purely because they’re weak minded enough to fall prey to logical fallacies like appeals to establishment.
Really enjoying your content, your conclusions are spot on. Subscribed and following.
Great to hear a fellow Aussie shares my views on the ancient past, the world still holds many mysteries.
Do you plan on visiting sites in India , oh and Baalbek?
Thanks! No current plans, but I hope to one day soon.
Hi Ben,
is it possible that they used some sort of anti-gravity power you mentioned in the jre episode to lower the boxes into place?
As you said, there’s no way they could fit hundreds of people down there and I can’t see how else they could have done it.
What do you think?
thanks
Chris
Although the ancient Egyptians could probably make hemp ropes that could hold 50 or more tons, what kind of wood beam could possible be made to hold that weight over a hole or opening? Also did they have block and tackle technology? What were they made of? What were the axle and hooks made of?
Once you start pulling on these threads the current theories of Egyptologists quickly falls apart. Personally I think ancient Egyptians made crucible steel. The Vikings made high quality steel swords using this method and that technology was lost (like Roman Cement) only to be rediscovered in modern times.
If this technology was much older than the dynastic era, little steel or iron would survive to this day unlike bronze. Also steel tools were probably very valuable and not likely to be left laying around. When was the last time you stumbled across a Snap-On wrench just lying in the grass!