Part 2! The Younger Dryas Cataclysm at the Carolina Bays with Antonio Zamora – Podcast #6.5

UnchartedX Podcast #6.5! This is Part 2 of my interview and conversation with Antonio Zamora, an independent researcher and scientist who has developed a new model for the formation of the Carolina Bays, and shows how they are fallout damage from the Younger Dryas Cosmic Impact of 12,800 years ago.

Part 1, please watch first!: https://youtu.be/YmndmJek0ik

7 thoughts on “Part 2! The Younger Dryas Cataclysm at the Carolina Bays with Antonio Zamora – Podcast #6.5”

  1. Ben,

    I had little hard to understand this 2 videos, as I would need it texted.
    So much I get it’s about the idea of a strike and parts from it was fallen in 2 direction.
    Can you tell me just fast and briefly what it’s about, and the ‘special’ insights.

    1. Hey Hank. Antonio’s videos are pretty good, he also has papers that go into the details of this (on his website).

      High level idea is that the Carolina Bays were formed as a result of one of the younger dryas cosmic impacts to the ice in the Great Lakes region. Ice impact ejected ice boulders of various sizes into sub-orbital ballistic trajectories, and resulted in saturation bombardment and the formation of the carolina bays and nebraska rainwater basins.

      The bays are perfectly elliptical, and all oriented towards the impact site in the great lakes region, there are roughly 500,000 of them, ranging in size from small to fairly large (3-4 km diameter) in size.

      Antonio has used experiments and the scientific method to support his theory. To me it is large-scale proof of the younger dryas, which is the event that makes the hypothesis of an ancient lost civilization possible, as it was an incredible cataclysm that changed the surface of the earth.

  2. I see a strange and exciting possible connection with Randall Carlson’s study of “forest fires” very very very near to the Saginaw Bay, specifically the Hinckley and Peshtigo/Chicago fires, with the Peshtigo fire even occurring precisely, as Randall points out, at the peak of (one of the two yearly passes through) the ominous Taurid meteor stream. I’m sure both of you are familiar with his study of the fires, so I won’t bother to bore you with a summary here.

    I am scratching my head right now and I will offer up a pretty darn feeble theory. This is just an immature, on-the-spot idea, so please do not take me for a complete crackpot too quickly. There are probably better approaches to try to arrive at an explanation. And, even though Randall denies the existence of coincidence, this is most-likely one good example.

    I wonder if you gentlemen have gone down the Electric Universe rabbit-hole (one of the best rabbit-holes in the fertile fields of mystery). The basic idea is that Gravity is a poorly-understood and a relatively weak force compared with electromagnetism, which, it is demonstrated very convincingly by the Electric Universe crowd, dominates celestial affairs, rather than Gravity. They also demonstrate that comets are rocks, like asteroids, which are often high in metallic materials (i.e. magnetically-influenceable materials), rather than being snowballs (and this bit is important to what I’m going to offer up as the link between the proposed Saginaw Bay impact and the “forest fires” at essentially the same location).

    There is a particular current (pun intended) within the Electric Universe (“EU”) community, which sees current-paths going through the atmosphere and through the Earth through specific points, like at plate boundaries or through particular rock types, or electromagnetically-significant locations within the banded geomagnetic field of our poor Earth, which flies so near to a star that spews out dangerous storms of radiation and plasma once in a while, in addition to a steady stream of both.

    An example of this asymmetry of incoming and outgoing electric currents to/from space over Earth’s surface, is the filamented/banded nature of the aurora – it’s not just an even pouring of current, blanketing evenly over Earth’s surface at the poles; the current is instead conveyed in discrete banded columns/filaments, and some bands extend toward the equator. The aurora called “Steve”, are a great example of this concentration of current paths (with a not-so-great name).

    So, my ridiculous and outlandish idea which I just cooked up in haste while watching your interchange, goes something like:

    Space rocks (a group which, without doubt, include comets), don’t just fall to Earth by simple Gravitic trajectories, using simple Newtonian-style equations. Rather, being full of magnetically-influenceable materials (iron and nickel, for example), our eternally-threatening space nemeses follow certain currents/fields, attracting them to, say, centers of continental plates for some reason. The only thing I can conjure out of hand at this ungodly hour, is that continental crust has more quartz, and quartz has weird piezo-electric properties, and that this would be why the great lakes are smack-dab in the center of a thick broad plate (with no faults or processes to blame for lake-formation). I certainly don’t buy the idea that glaciers formed them. That, sounds like the crackpot idea to me. But, I guess that would be a cracked-kettle calling a cracked-pot cracked; so maybe this idea is not all that its cracked up to be…

    What if an incoming rock connects current from space to ground, thereby making a specific conducting path to key points???

    Note how this might be a good thing – to move people out of harm’s way, and enjoy watching the rocks being directed out of harm’s way elsewhere on Earth’s surface! Yay! Although, I would still take cover while enjoying the fireworks from afar, eh?

    I understand if you think this is totally bonkers. If I were to have read these words, say, 10 years ago, I would have called social services have me carted away to the loonie bin.

    Anyhoo,

    Great new channel.
    I love thorough interviews.
    So much material out there is unnecessarily concise and usually uninformative as a result, without allowing time to digest the idea and contemplate on the matter in any significant way.

    And, excellent work Mr. Zamora. It looks like you’re enjoying your research too, which is super-important. I feel that keeping good cheer is the first step to finding solutions and solving riddles. Your exuberant countenance reveals that you understand this instinctively. There’s more to life than depressing tales of doom from space rocks killing giant beavers. And there’s more important things than convincing mainstream dogmatic science that there is error in their logic and approach to ancient goings-on.

    All the best with your further sleuthing.

    1. After regretting leaving this insane post, wishing I never hit the “submit” button, cringing in shame for having spoken before thinking; I wanted to review the situation, and Randall Carlson just so happened to have recently released more information – more direct quotes, from the fires, so it got me thinking, if Earth’s geomagnetic field were to direct and attract space-rocks in specific bands, extending to the equator from the poles, the specific bands should generally be strong at certain specific latitudes. So, I set about compiling the latitudes of the 4 major fires Randall documents:

      Miramichi (1825 47.0296° N)
      Peshtigo (1871 45.0544° N)
      Hinckley (1894 46.0150° N)
      Montana (1910 Bitterroot Mountains = 45.8077° N)

      ????

      And, seemingly a separate coincidence, at the great lakes, Duluth is at the very bottom tip of lake superior, and Chicago is right at the bottom tip of lake Michigan. In fact, there are accounts, in 1871, even from the side of lake Michigan opposite Peshtigo – on the eastern flank of lake Michigan. Do the lakes themselves represent millions of years of attracting space-rocks, like a sacrificial focal-point?

      Again, this is almost certainly coincidence and my explanation is almost certainly nonsense. I’m just throwing this out there, because I do not understand why, especially in the case of Peshtigo compared with Hinckley, why in the world are meteors choosing to fall in the same area with similar circumstances and aftermaths, just a few years apart. Randall’s recent posts will attest to the fact that it was surely, without doubt, meteors that struck, in both cases, 23 years apart, 300 miles apart.

      Again, the point being here: these are right in the Saginaw Bay area, both in 1871 and 1894. Very strange. I do not understand this “coincidence”. I’m just clutching at straws.

      Maybe somebody here can offer up an alternative explanation or approach to solve this riddle. I feel my explanation of this “focal point” is “missing the mark” 🙂

  3. I think that Younger Dryas impact theory is very plausible. But I do see a major hole in the theory about the formation of the Carolina Bays. At the theorized time of the impact, 12,800 years ago, Saginaw Bay was on the very edge of the ice sheet. I could not find a map on the internet that showed the extent of the ice in that time period that was not supporting the Younger Dryas Impact theory. All the maps and videos of the general period I found showed the edge of the ice was either in Saginaw Bay or had retreated beyond it. There would not have been enough ice to create the Carolina Bays and there would have been a detectable impact on the rocky surface of the earth. So I think that investigators should either confirm there was sufficient ice in that area, or find a different location of the impact.

  4. Watched your video The case for rewriting history, and was very impressed but also noticed at the end of the video at around 19:29 you can see a UFO appear just below and to the left of the Sphinx head and to right of the pyramid on the left, very close to the ground then it flashes quickly to the left of the screen. Then another one appears at 19:33 near the top of the left pyramid and disappear into the ground in front. You have to look very closely and if you can freeze quick enough you will see them or just run the video and be aware of them and you will notice the flash before your eyes. I have seen many of these and they travel so fast that the eye can’t see them. Hope you don’t mind me pointing them out, some people refuse to admit that they exist much like the history of the past!
    Good luck

    1. You’re not the only one to mention it, I think some people also saw something in my Abu Sir video. I don’t know what it is, (I suspect it’s just noise) but of course I can’t say for sure… who knows 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *