I have a 2nd youtube channel – would love your sub over there! And a video on my thoughts on Ancient Aliens, UFOs, and disclosure…

I get into the third rail topic of history videos, and give my thoughts on the ‘other A word’, ancient aliens! I wanted to cover it as it’s a question that comes up frequently, and is fairly topical given the current news coverage of so-called ‘disclosure’ and the 60 minutes piece on UFP/UFOs. (Of course they copyright claimed this video).

Thanks for watching,, and let me know what you think, I’m sure it’s a contentious topic. Please consider subscribing to this channel – it’s my secondary channel and I’ll be uploading more stream highlights here when I can! If you want to catch me live, I stream 3 days at week on Twitch, my channel and schedule are here: https://twitch.tv/unchartedx .

10 thoughts on “I have a 2nd youtube channel – would love your sub over there! And a video on my thoughts on Ancient Aliens, UFOs, and disclosure…”

  1. Good to see you addressing the ‘elephant in the room’ about inexplicable evidence -the FredHoyle et al panspermia/pandemic hypothesis and genetics deserve more investigation for sure . Anti gravity as an explanation of ‘handling’ immense stones is also relevant (we do not know why inertial mass and gravitational mass are exactly equal or have proved Mach’s postulate re origin of inertia . Ilan Kroo’s derivation is interesting .(airplanes react gravity with inertia -of the air- and we do not really understand either-said as an aircraft designer ) The similarities of ancient stonework all over the world with the complete absence of one continent (Australia) is also significant – a worldwide civilization missing one huge landmass has to mean something , but what. Hapgood on polar drift is worth a look.

  2. supplementary -the ‘extra terrestrial’ explanation of mankind’s makeup is standard religion (Jesus was extra terrestrial and God used genetic engineering in the standard biblical account – Enoch was conveyed off Earth via some spaceship sounding device (there is a book on this whole subject of ETs and tech in the bible) The Nephilim are explicitly ‘off world’ and interbreeding with female humans . Angels and devils certainly aren’t from earth and exhibit high technology capabilities (i recall vividly seeing Chariots of the Gods around 1970 and followed this ‘thread’ since -I also actually saw the Murchison meteorite fall from the gliding field at Mildura . The book “the genesis stone’ ,about it,is well worth a (technical) read re the panspermia concept. Truth is stranger than fiction many times .

  3. I just discovered your channel. So far so good.
    While watching your videos I had a thought about the heavy blocks of granite which are used amongst the bases of pyramids.
    They could have been floated in if the topograohy was previously different or dams and canals had been built. You had a picture of 3 pyramids and all had canals built away from the pyramids to the water ways. If the canals werent recent builds they could have been modified to float blocks up and into place.

    Might be hard work building water ways, canals and lochs.
    But not as hard as building a pyramid.

  4. Where are the aliens? (Fermi) OK, but where are the Ux devotees? Is the absence of response evidence of their alien abduction, or what ? SERIOUSLY, AM i THE ONLY ONE “OUT THERE?” (caps lock error..) The ‘sliced’ rocks in south america are possibly the hardest to fathom -something like a rock cutting chainsaw (they exist) would be required but with zero end radius (impossible) -no infinite patience and flint chippers can do it . How about a prize to duplicate this anomaly? we need a very close up of the interior corners to look for any signs of post working and tool marks .Geopolymer is clearly ruled out so how was it done? (even with known power tools ) The Inca throne and steps would be good candidates -how about the Peruvian government puts up the prize and provides a boulder or two -great for publicity and more tourism and doesn’t cost Ux any $. any thoughts?

  5. C’mon guys -how about some considered speculation on what ‘high technology’ might actually mean ? an engineering approach to the end result is only step one (thanks Chris Dunn/Petrie et al) reverse engineering HOW it could have been done is the fun part.(!) If we rule out .dolerite and copper hand tools we are left with either ‘imported’ high tech (aliens) or some other ‘indigenous’ high tech -precision powered machine tools. This does not have to be electrical but could be pneumatic or hydraulic -air drills are common in the aircraft industry and hydraulic power is similar (Melbourne and Bristol had the two largest hydraulic power systems operating lifts, printing presses, forging etc before electrification (see Swinburne water power Melbourne on google ) maybe this was their method . The ‘water lily’ capitals on humungous granite columns at Tanis are astounding (I want to see the ends -are there turning centres evident? ) the enigmatic ‘blind’ interior corners are another puzzling fact in need of an explanation as to means –only high speed rotational tools seem feasible.

  6. Better search term “Melbourne hydraulic power company” -the Ancient egyptians could bore accurately and therefore also make pistons (using turning skills) so they could in theory construct air or water powered tools (perhaps even steam power ) – flexible reasonably high pressure hoses are needed but some combination of rubber like organic materials could plausibly do the job – to get rotational motion is not so hard and reciprocating via clackervalves or resonant (vibrating) discharge devices -reed valves or something elastic for return of a piston leading to a jackhammer concept right down to dentists drill size (able to cut precise hieroglyphs ) – ‘hydraulic hammer’ in piping is a well known phenomena that gives rapid pressure pulses automatically . Much easier than inventing power tools ,electric motors, dynamos and all the rest and of course water power preceded reticulated electricity in our civilization — still leaves so much unanswered but might be worth further investigation and if nothing else ‘thinking it through’ further debunks the hand chipping hypothesis .

  7. We need someone to take a latex or silicone rubber ‘splash’ of some of the precision ‘engraving’ of heiroglyphs from an obelisk or similar artifact to determine just how accurate these incised figures actually are (and possibly disclose any tool marks ) -the absence of any apparent errors or chipping seems to imply routing with diamond or corundum tool bits or else casting in artificial granite . Either way the technology involved is not trivial and would provide more clues . The constancy of depth of grooving ,squareness of corners, accuracy of shape all speak to an industrial process rather than hand work , just by eye ,but proper metrology would settle the issue . Did Petrie do any such investigation ?(using beeswax perhaps in those days ) Reproducing this by hand is a standing challenge.

  8. It is hard to fathom why no one seems to take the step of asking “If not hand held stone or copper tools then WHAT has manufactured the astounding stone artifacts we find ? ” -the Russian ‘de bunkers’ make the best case AGAINST simple painstaking ‘stone age’ technology by showing how implausible it is in practice — just pushing back the timeline to a far distant lost civilization ,if anything ,just adds to the difficulty of HOW the know how and physical equipment required came to exist (Atlantis etc) The ‘off Earth” origin hypothesis is tenable if the astronomical timeline/ extended technological potential is used. Imagine trying to explain Austrakia’s technological sophistication NOW without finding ANY evidence of ANY prior metallurgy ,science etc – it WAS all “imported” ready made from ‘elsewhere’

  9. The silence is deafening (and not just at SETI) –the new NASA head is quite open to the existence of high tech ancient non terrestrial civilization and contact , discussion is not taboo… “Imported’ anomalous high technology is easier to invoke than such a technology ‘home grown’ in the real stone age –the ‘most perfect’ stone box’ on Ux or the elephantine island pyramidal topped box, the serapeum boxes ,the square edged interior ‘slices’ in peru ,the incredible precision etc etc all stretch credulity for a perfect ‘first go’ at ‘machining’ megalithic rock from literal scratch – the further back in time the less likely this becomes and all without trace of means or origins.. The interior corners are still perplexing with present tech… they are there but how?

  10. From whence we came? Isn’t that the big question we would all like answered? I really enjoyed this video and agree about the Sitchin comments and the intervention theory. I had listened to this Lloyd Pye lecture years ago and found it quite fascinating.

    I would like to take a little different perspective on our history however. Rather than capabilities such as the use of tools, (copper?) and methods (ramps?) It is imperative if you are going to build something as complex as the pyramids, (and the Sphinx) and to have them last for so long, that you have the knowledge to engineer something so complex. I researched the rate of increase in the level of knowledge of humans. I found a chart that depicted a very slow but gradual increase in the rate of knowledge over many millions of years. The line on the chart was pretty much horizontal until (interestingly enough) the 40’s when the atomic bomb was developed. From there the level of knowledge quickly turned the corner into an almost straight vertical line to present day.

    So what’s the point you may ask, this seems plausible. Well, if the knowledge level of humans was very gradually progressing over thousands of years during the period it is purported the pyramids were built then how were they conceived from a practical stand point? If, what they achieved could not be duplicated today then that begs two important questions. #1, Where did the knowledge come from that allowed peoples of that time to embark upon such an endeavor and #2 What then happened to that knowledge? How was it lost? (Younger Dryas anyone?) So either the chart that I found was completely erroneous or there was some knowledge intervention we are not aware of.

    To me this speaks of two possibilities. That there existed advanced life upon the earth prior to us for which we have no knowledge (Atlantean theory?) or that an outside source (beings from beyond our planet?) brought it here prior to a cataclysm. Now which is it?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *