Ancient precision confirmed!
The last few months has been a busy time for the vase scan team. Led by Chris Dunn, Alex Dunn and Nick Sierra, the team gathered in a precision lab in Danville IL to do a hands-on metrology inspection of several vases. Not only that, but many more of the remarkable ancient, hard stone vases that come from pre-dynastic and early dynastic ancient Egypt have been scanned via structured light and CT-Xray, and the results are frankly astonishing.
Not only has the incredible precision results of the original vase been confirmed in other artifacts, geometric and mathematical analysis has shown shared design principles between multiple vases – the same radial traversal function, the same fixed mathematical ratio between curvatures, and the same depth of elegance in the extensive use of pi and phi.
If you enjoyed the video, please consider supporting UnchartedX via the value-for-value model at https://unchartedx.com/support
Edit: a small correction on the provenance of the large vase mentioned in this video:
I talked with Adam (owner of some of the vases in the current target collection) and we have a small correction on the provenance mentioned about the large vase on the table in the Danville video, when he said that it was exported from Egypt in the late 1800s. It was exported from Egypt in the 1930s.
That vase was from the Collection of Stanislav Kovar. He was a Czech diplomat, born in Prague in 1889. At that point, it was part of the Austro Hungarian empire. He brought vases out of Egypt in the 1930s.
Czechoslovakia was formed in 1918, but the word Czech is older. from Google: The words “Czechian”, “Czechish”, “Czechic” and later “Czech” (using antiquated Czech spelling) have appeared in English-language texts since the 17th century. During the 19th-century national revival, the word “Czech” was also used to distinguish between the Czech- and German-speaking peoples living in the country.
It is a well established fact that European diplomats brought out huge numbers of vases from Egypt before, during, and after this time.
You mentioned 16 ghz in the video, but I didn’t catch why that frequency is significant.
The next question, now that an advanced civilisation has been established, is what was the point of these vases?
The task of analysing, in detail, every artefact they may have created, becomes the best and maybe the only way to identify their motivations.
I understand there are many pieces of broken vessels just lying around in the Step Pyramid. These need to be collected, catalogued and scanned. My assumption is that because the vases are designed to a geometric formulae, a shard can be used to resurrect the vessel it was part of.
Thus knowing the shape and composition of in excess of 40,000 items may cast some light on the question.
I have a good feeling that the beehive vase may indeed be unfinished – i.e. it is only at the roughing stage. If true, the beehive is showing what might be called ‘scoop marks’, and that’s something of a universal signature…
If you take the OG vase, with the mouth diameter set equal to 1, and scale the beehive by the ratio of the vase mouths (OG mouth : beehive mouth, something like 1.23:1) the two vases are almost identical, except that the beehive’s main body has a 100% material-on condition relative to the ‘finished’ OG vase’s main body.
Hi Ben,
I’ve been a long term believer in the ancient civilisation theory, starting way back in the 90s with Graham Hancocks first Tzv series, “Quest for the lost Civilisation” which is available on All4 for anyone that might be interested. I recently came across your videos and was fascinated by these stone jars which I’d never heard of before. I am also a big fan of the film “BAM – builders of ancient mysteries” which is available on Amazon Prime and shows that some of the ancient Peruvian artifacts that you’ve seen, namely the H shaped blocks were, in actual fact, seemingly measured in the metric system, being exactly 1M high and having cut outs that measure 30cm in width. It’s well worth a watch if you haven’t already done so. The most interesting thing about that film, however, which I’d love to see your point of view on, are the caves in India at Barabar which are resonance chambers which have been perfectly cut out of granite outcroppings and have interiors that are perfectly flat to within a micrometer or two. If you aren’t yet aware of them then I suggest that you check them out asap.
Really enjoying your work bud, keep it up!
I’m a big fan of BAM, and I’ve also recorded a podcast with the man behind it, my friend Patrice Pouillard, check it out in my video list on youtube. I’m aware of and very interested in their work on the Barabar caves.
Hi, really enjoying your work. Have you ever seen the stone artifacts left by the Lianghzu culture? Completely different style from Egyptian stone vases but the technique looks like they retained some knowledge on how to work hard stone, even corundum, with diamond tools.
I am an architect, and the fact that work was done in the ancient past that we can not do today, was what convinced me what we have been sold a history that is clearly wrong. The fact that at many different sites across the world the oldest work is the most complex, precise, and again unrepeatable today, and that less capable work is found above or adding to this older work begs a question that we all must pursue an answer to. But it was just this morning, when I was contemplating the stated ages of the kings in the Kings List that it hit me, what if this idea, that the Egyptians were working their way up to perfecting the pyramid, is all wrong. What if the pyramids at Giza were built in the ancient past and represent the skills, tooling, and knowledge that the later Egyptians were only able to try to imitate without the skills, tooling, and knowledge available in that past time? Somehow access to those ancient capabilities was lost over time, and running parallel to that loss of capabilities, was a decline in the life span of the Kings in the Kings List. This tells me that something was being lost or diluted in the capabilities of the cultures across the world. I guess my one insight here is that rather than working up to perfecting the pyramid, perhaps the most difficult pyramid was built first, and then those capabilities were lost and the all future attempts at pyramid building fell short. In support of this, if I remember correctly, the Giza pyramids have no interior writing, carving, or art, while all of the others are highly decorated along with the tombs in the Valley of the Kings. This would represent a significant cultural change, and perhaps support the idea that the Giza Pyramids came first.