Changing History! The Ancient Egyptian Hard Stone Vases. New Video

It’s time to revisit the ancient Egyptian Vase Scan Project – a lot has happened in 2024, and even more is planned for 2025. These tiny, ancient, amazing artifacts are changing history.

Scans and analysis has shown some of them to be incredibly precise, meticulously, elegantly and mathematically designed, with that design being immaculately executed in ridiculously hard types of igneous rock.

My initial vase scan videos and the project has generated considerable response, and this video is meant to be a comprehensive overview of the project and topic so far, a response to some of the main criticisms of the work, and an update on what happened in 2024 – which included getting into museums to scan artifacts with impeccable provenance (spoiler, they’re precise too!).

Many thanks to my patrons and supporters, as well as to the dedicated people working as part of the Vase Scan Team. Particular thanks to Adam Young and his newly created nonprofit Artifact Foundation (https://artifactfoundation.org/) that is driving a lot of this work going forward.

Check out the links to all the articles and videos mentioned, as well as the chapters, timestamps, below.

Please consider supporting UnchartedX via the value for value model at https://unchartedx.com/support !

8 thoughts on “Changing History! The Ancient Egyptian Hard Stone Vases. New Video”

  1. Heavy blocks can be moved across a smooth surface by maintaining a thin film of water between the block and surface. While there is a more obvious causeway from the Valley Temple to the Kahfre Pyramid, there appears from Google Maps to be partial and maybe buried causeways from what may have been a Nile tributary that flowed along in front of the Sphinx Temple and Valley Temple to each of the other Pyramids. The hypothesis is that the builders carried water out in front of the blocks being moved from the tributary to the plateau on these causeways and kept the causeways wet to help drag the blocks. I have seen pictures where the workers are dragging the blocks on sleds, but this may have been done on the causeways with a thin layer of sand and water and not out in the barren sand. I am not sure if this hypothesis has been considered.

    This same principle could be applied to lifting the blocks up to the top as the layers were placed using a smooth stone ramp with water and a thin layer of sand. Workers at the layer being built would pull the blocks or blocks on sleds from their level with ropes and other workers would replenish water and sand on the ramps as needed. Depending on how smooth the casing stones were, they could have been used as the ramp all the way around the pyramid as the casing stones were added.

  2. I’m old, don’t know if this is will be read, or any other way of putting this out there.
    To Ben.
    Don’t know if I’ve seen this right, but the holes through the lug handles appear (at least from the videos) to follow the contour of the vase body. I don’t know of any technique that allows ‘a drill’ hole to curve through any medium let alone granite.
    Just a thought.

    1. The holes are generally drilled straight from both sides from what I can see. Many, perhaps most, vases don’t have the holes. THey’re not precise. I suspect they were added later, in a primitive fashion.

  3. I have a 99% probability answer for how and why the pyramids were built and when that doesn’t involve crazy shit but I have no way to put the info out there. if you’d like it have me on and/or collaborate with me, id love to discuss it. I’m a huge fan and love your perspective by the way. 702-802-8287 John Thacker

    1. Can’t help you sorry, you will need to publish and put your own ideas out there. I get requests like this all the time. If you think you can ‘tell’ me, then you can write it down or tell a camera.

  4. Ben,
    I am a big fan of your work. When one looks at the moon, it is covered with thousands of impact craters. The Earth’s surface area is 13 X that of the moon, meaning it has been struck by meteors and comets proportionally more times, but nearly all those craters were obliterated by the Earth’s biosphere, so we tend to forget this fact. This suggests that impacts large enough to cause species extinction were probably the rule rather than the exception for much of the Earth’s history. When dealing with timelines measured in the hundreds of millions of years, this makes the idea of a now-obliterated prior civilization much more plausible.

  5. I think that the maths inset into the design of the vases was a natural consequence of the way reality was being perceived by the people that made them.

    The tool they used to make the vases also had an effect over the consciousness of the people making them, enabling them to perceive reality in a similar manner to how a mathematical savant like Jason Padgett might see it, or similarly to how reality is perceived on drugs like mushrooms, acid or ayahuasca.

    Giving them a lens to work the material to a precision level, aiding them in shaping the stone physically, and imbuing their conscience with an enhanced perception of natures fundamental and innate laws that they naturally superimposed upon the vases.

    The tool in question sounds magical or fanciful. But I think its presence in reality is closer than we might believe.

Leave a Reply to John Thacker Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *