10,000 words and counting…

10,000 words and (I hope) nearly done with the script for a deep dive back into the evidence for machining in Ancient Egypt. A focus on this remarkable granite piece at Abu Rawash, its witness marks and connections to other evidence. Cut radially in two axis, it’s concave, with clear kerfs and striations. Bit of a mind bender.

Been deep in this stuff recently, hopefully new video coming in the next couple weeks. For patrons, channel members etc, in the next couple of days I will record a supporter-only video going over what I’ve been working on and get into the compelling evidence behind this and other machined pieces of hard stone.

4 thoughts on “10,000 words and counting…”

  1. Hi Ben,

    Hope you don’t mind me getting in touch. Just noticed your new 10,000 word article is nearly ready. Looking forward to reading it.. 🙂
    I finished a 5 Yr book project last year. Self published which was probably a mistake as I’m not connected on social media and had no idea how hard ithe marketing and am not comfortable.promoting myself.

    Anyhow, your research in Anatolia amd egypt is what connects this message to my book. ‘Zep-Tepi: The binding of time and space’. I would be grateful if you would accept a free copy to peruse over.
    I recently got the thumbs up from Graham Hancock and he has a pretty good write up for it on his site. https://grahamhancock.com/whitakera1/ which explains it quite well.
    If you find it interesting or worthy, I would very much appreciate a thumbs up on your website. Any help would be gratefully received.

    Very best regards and keep up the good work,

    Alex whitaker.

      1. Hi Ben, thanks.

        Sorry for getting in touch here, I wasn’t sure where was the right place.

        Your welcome to delete my post to keep the feed clean.

        Best regards

        Alex

  2. Perhaps the boxes of the Serapeum were created on top of the land as a “set,” were then “caged” with something or the other, and the whole caged set was later swooped as one object by a massive flood of clay, soil, piles of rocks, debris or whatever into the position the set now lies. After eons, the affluent material surrounding the set of boxes would harden into stone, and that is why we had to dig for them. I think of all the stuff that is found in sewer systems that has been swept there by running “water” and other debris. The difference is that this would have happened so long ago that the affluent containing the caged set would have since hardened into stone, thus encapsulating the caged boxes in the process. Has anyone investigated the encapsulating rock for its age? There should be carbon datable remnants in the stone. Perhaps we should be looking at the ground itself as deep as it many times goes, instead of what it contains.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *