I’ve wanted to speak with Randall for many years now, and was thrilled to get the chance to do just that recently, and it was a very enjoyable and educational couple of hours. We get into Megafloods, the Younger Dryas, the cosmic environment, climate change, the sun, and more!
Many thanks to Randall, hopefully we get the chance to continue ‘scratching the surface’ in future discussions.
Why are there no historical or mythological oral traditions in the Paleo-Indian cultures, passed on by the survivors of the ice boulder barrage during the Younger Dryas, which killed many, but not all, of the humans in North America? It seems as though that deficiency is a strong argument against the theory that a comet(s) initiated the Younger Dryas Interval, along with killing many mega-mammals and leaving the Carolina Bays.
There are several such stories amongst the Hopi and other native american cultures. I believe i mentioned a few of them in the ‘myths, gods and the younger dryas cataclysm’ video. A longer list is covered by Randall Carlson in some of his lectures on his channel…
Great discussion. As a youngster I was fascinated by Velikovsky’s book ‘Worlds in Collision’ 60 years ago, and it’s great to see his ideas slowly coming to the fore.
However, someone has to take issue with both speakers showing contempt about CO2 increase in the atmosphere concerns. A massive majority of climate scientists hold this “inconvenient truth”. The effects are blindingly obvious. This is not a matter of US political partianship.
I’m sure plenty of people take issue with it, but that’s primary due to the prevalence of junk science being peddled by the alarmist political narrative that gets swallowed by the general public. CO2 is not forcing the climate, it’s a trace gas in the atmosphere that has an infinitesimal impact (if any) on climate, it’s not a pollutant, and more of it isn’t doing anything other than greening the planet. It’s absolutely a political issue, and it’s going to evaporate by 2022 once these vaunted (and always entirely wrong) models are opening up to the impact of the SUN on climate.
Nice to know you cut your teeth like I did on Velikovsky (read all his other books too).
You appear to have misunderstood where Randall & Ben are coming from in their comments about CO2.
The body of Science has moved on a great deal since when CO2 was the only influence worth considering, but that is now over 30 and more years ago.
• It is almost a consensus that global warming is taking place.
• The differences are:
• 1. Whether it is natural or man-made.
• 2. Whether the rate is alarming or slow.
• 3. Whether the policy of UN Climate Summit to replace fossil fuels energy resources with solar and wind is pragmatic particularly
for poor countries.
Here is a multi-scientistic based ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ page, to a petition which will bring you more up to date on the current consensus.
http://www.petitionproject.org/frequently_asked_questions.php
What is worrying most of us that follow climate change, fails to be mentioned much in the press yet. Although it is in science journals. And its not CO2. Here is a taster of the sort of work being done:
Energy from space (27 Feb 2018) : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsqZJP54shg&list=PLHSoxioQtwZcm9KdHf_n8WsF2IFB4FVvq&index=5
And the science journal Nature has a good scientific paper (which is the most up to date I can find, Published: June 2019) that explains the real reason why Earth is getting warmer:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-45584-3
I have recently discovered these podcasts and other information on catastrophic events changing the Earths surfaces for milliohm. This has become a new passion now and I am enjoying all of the people who are questioning the established dogma. A good friend of mine who is a geologist always told me of how the earliest studies of our planet called the attempt to imagine the millions of years of Earth’s history as “whiskey geology”. In my mind this means you need to look at this from an altered state. Getting people to look at how our planet and the life forces have evolved from this different point of view. Thank you for questioning the paradigm.
PLEASE,
You may not want to put this out on the main site until you have a chance to look at it. I don’t want just anybody getting thee to see it because anybody can edit it now and it’s a lot of wwork to keep it “Pristine” if you get my drift.
Dear Mr. Randal Carlson,
I have been working in my spare time on a little project that I call the “Atlantis Location Hypothesis.” Starting back in college and before, I got interested in Otto Muck’s book “Secret of Atlantis”. I didn’t get particularly interested then, but long about 2009, I started on Wikipedia. It wasn’t long before I got kicked off but I was wisked off to Wikiversity. Anyway, I want you to look at this in your spare time and get back with me and tell me what you think. I am stuck in the Younger Dryas, your specialty. They had some legal trouble on wikiversity with this work, so they hid it as a “Draft” It seems the cottage industry known as Thera (Santorini) tours have been passing their caldera off as Atlantis, but it’s not. That’s not where Plato said that it was.
Go here, https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Atlantis/Location_Hypotheses
Click on the small Atlantis under the big Atlantis < Atlantis
Go next to 'Resource' at the top AND, click on 'Discuss'
Go down under Atlantis Draft and click on (the top site)
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Draft:Location_hypotheses_of_Atlantis
the lower site duplicate belongs to Marshallsumpter who works for NASA
He hasn't been working on his much, either.
Read at your leisure and get back with me, Don't follow the references at first. It's too time consuming. This is what we have been calling "Plato's Geography Lesson"
…and man, does it EVER get deep.
Please let me know what you think. I found you on "youtube" So I know you have a mind like mine from what I've seen. So you will understand what I have went through to get this far.
Thanks, and Happy reading of the Project, a work in progress, but I have not made much lately. Contact me by e-mail
Sincerely,
John Garner
Thanks for the work you are doing, Ben! Chris Dunn is an old acquaintance of mine through his web site and articles. I now have someone who can pick up where Chris leaves off in the future.
Thanks for the comment Stephanie.. That’s high praise indeed, I’ll be doing my best to continue investigating these mysteries! I hope to interview Chris on my channel in the near future.
I have recently discovered these podcasts and other information on catastrophic events changing the Earths surfaces for milliohm. This has become a new passion now and I am enjoying all of the people who are questioning the established dogma. A good friend of mine who is a geologist always told me of how the earliest studies of our planet called the attempt to imagine the millions of years of Earth’s history as “whiskey geology”. In my mind this means you need to look at this from an altered state. Getting people to look at how our planet and the life forces have evolved from this different point of view. Thank you for questioning the paradigm.