An interview with Yousef Awyan, stonemason, guide and musician, where we discuss many topics around the mysteries and technologies of Ancient Egypt.
Links:
Experiment video (precusor to this one): https://youtu.be/PS1azzN0b-I
Please consider subscribing to my 2nd channel, UnchartedXLive! I stream on this channel occasionally, and upload non history related videos:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7CljFbRtVJeYM8_s0Kqybw
Hey, Ben.
Followed your work since around last december. Also been following the works of Graham Hancock, Randall Carlson and Brien Foerster.
I am fascinated by megalithic structures and especially the technologies that must have existed in order to create and move those stones.
I also follow a channel on youtube called “Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project”. They recently released a video looking at a patent describing a technology that I believe could enable us to replicate the megalithic work.
Here is a link to the video, would love to hear your thoughts and whether you’ve come across their work before. https://youtu.be/nA5XFkF3U2A
Additionally, are you familiar with Paul LaViolette’s theory of Subquantum Kinetics? He has also written extensively on “galactic superwaves” which could be the catalyst for many of the extenction level events in Earth’s history.
Here is a summary of his theory: https://starburstfound.org/subquantum-kinetics-a-nontechnical-summary/
I’m glad to see how far you’ve come even in the last year. I will definitely support you once I graduate and get some proper income.
Sincerely,
Sakari Pollari
Finland
Hello Ben:
Your work is revolutionary and inspiring. You’re facing the same problem in archaelogy as the rest of the world in most fields- cognitive dissonance. People, including educated ones, are amazingly adept at developing a belief and not swaying from it regardless of the evidence to the contrary. Your Younger Dryas work exposes the probability of earlier great advanced civilizations which opens a lot of other theories that our current history is likely far from complete and currently as it stands, quite incorrect.
The “establishment” researchers don’t want their apple cart upset – you need to topple it.
Thank you
Thanks Jim!
Hi Ben Thanks for all your work its been very interesting, and have been doing a lot of research that I can online at this point in time, but I would like your opinion of a recent video I saw. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMAtkjy_YK4&t=1119s
Fehmi Krasniqi
I disagree about his theory that the pyramids being a just tomb, but Im influenced by the theory that he indicated that the blocks where built by an ancient concrete known today as a polymer of materials that where poured into wooden moulds and where laid side by side in progression and filed with materials on or near the site itself, hence making the joins so close. The same for the blocks of Granite at the site of the pyramids in the similar moulds melting the stone into vases that cannot be done today and blocks that cannot be lifted from a large 5 metere magnify lens glass made from sodium silicate and potassium slicate, and then melting the granite in into clay in small block then remelted into clay moulds of whatever shape they wanted hence the polished look on the Granite vases and other large granite items.
I have yet to make my own magnifying lens or haven’t found even remotely a magnifying that large anywhere in Australia.
This theory ties up a lot of the megalithic site around the world and to the Egyptian writing in stone on the East Coast of Australia at Gosford
Nice to have your thoughts
Garry
I’m going to write a post about this soon, if not do a video on it. In short, I don’t like the geopolymer theory, and about 1000 people have sent me a link to the documentary about it. It has huge problems, and is pure speculation without any real evidence or experiment to back it up. I’ll get into the details, but for now
– we have quarries
– every block is a different shape and size (necessitating individual molds)
– you can’t cast granite – it is a conglomerate of many different types of material, quartz, feldspar, mica etc, that is all in large consitutuant pieces in the stones.
– there are strata lines on many granite objects, the stone came from a quarry.
– the limestone blocks have fossils in them, from the sedimentary sea bed, and we have limestone quarries
– the ‘giant lens’ theory is pure fantasy. Look up how difficult it is for us to create large glass mirrors for telescopes.
– how are you ‘melting quartz’ to make this lens? given granite is largely quartz, how is it not melting when you’re using it to melt granite (in this fantasy land)
– form release angles….
– someone needs to make a bag of this and actually show it….
– we have machining marks on many of the granite objects.
so yeah, not a fan of this theory.
Im not advocating the theory to be right, Im just cross referencing it with you, have you see the movie?
not yet, I just got back from Egypt. I understand the premise of it however, I’ll check it out sooner or later.
Another excellent video to which we’ve become accustomed!
You made an interesting comment regarding the Dynastic Egyptians prowess in their own right which I think undeniable fact, the issue(s) effecting opinion, or at least mine, suggest that the huge difference in the quality of the craftsmanship coupled with facility with which ancient artifacts appear to have been made leaves a yawning gap in history so readily and effectively covered up by the academic establishment and the curators of museums displaying Dynastic or pre-dynastic artifacts, effectively leading to an inherent almost rejection reaction of Dynastic achievements. This is a form of prejudice easily felt when we see the ‘tagging’ of these monuments and incredible artifacts by those masons and sculptors serving zealous masters.
Dear BV,
Is there any chance to get dimensions of the large bowls at Abu Ghorab. Specifically the depth of the inside of the bowls. I fudged some dimensions and went back to my tech. drawing notes and if a lens was formed inside those bowls, that lens would focus light ( like a magnifying glass ) into a spot. Due to the size of those bowls, in broad sunlight, the heat at that spot would exceed 700c, which can melt granite.
PS: I thoroughly enjoy your video’s ( great resolution ) and your choice comments.
probably yes, I have lidar scans of the bowls, and it should be possible to get dimensions from them, i’ll add them to my lidar download page.